Expression of genes controlling fat deposition in two genetically diverse beef cattle breeds fed high or low silage diets
da Costa et al. BMC Veterinary Research 2013, 9:118
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/9/118
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access
Expression of genes controlling fat deposition in
two genetically diverse beef cattle breeds fed
high or low silage diets
Ana Sofia Henriques da Costa, Virgínia Maria Rico Pires, Carlos Mendes Godinho Andrade Fontes
and José António Mestre Prates*
Abstract
Background: Both genetic background and finishing system can alter fat deposition, thus indicating their influence
on adipogenic and lipogenic factors. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying fat deposition and fatty acid
composition in beef cattle are not fully understood. This study aimed to assess the effect of breed and dietary
silage level on the expression patterns of key genes controlling lipid metabolism in subcutaneous adipose tissue
(SAT) and longissimus lumborum (LL) muscle of cattle. To that purpose, forty bulls from two genetically diverse
Portuguese bovine breeds with distinct maturity rates, Alentejana and Barrosã, were selected and fed either low
(30% maize silage/70% concentrate) or high silage (70% maize silage/30% concentrate) diets.
Results: The results suggested that enhanced deposition of fatty acids in the SAT from Barrosã bulls, when
compared to Alentejana, could be due to higher expression levels of lipogenesis (SCD and LPL) and β-oxidation
(CRAT) related genes. Our results also indicated that SREBF1 expression in the SAT is increased by feeding the low
silage diet. Together, these results point out to a higher lipid turnover in the SAT of Barrosã bulls when compared
to Alentejana. In turn, lipid deposition in the LL muscle is related to the expression of adipogenic (PPARG and
FABP4) and lipogenic (ACACA and SCD) genes. The positive correlation between ACACA expression levels and total
lipids, as well trans fatty acids, points to ACACA as a major player in intramuscular deposition in ruminants.
Moreover, results reinforce the role of FABP4 in intramuscular fat development and the SAT as the major site for
lipid metabolism in ruminants.
Conclusions: Overall, the results showed that SAT and LL muscle fatty acid composition are mostly dependent on
the genetic background. In addition, dietary silage level impacted on muscle lipid metabolism to a greater extent
than on that of SAT, as evaluated by gene expression levels of adipogenic and lipogenic factors. Moreover, the
response to diet composition evaluated through mRNA levels and fatty acid composition showed interesting
differences between Alentejana and Barrosã bulls. These findings provide evidence that the genetic background
should be taken into account while devising diet-based strategies to manipulate fatty acid composition of beef
cattle tissues.
Keywords: Beef cattle, Adipose tissue, Muscle, Gene expression, Fat deposition
* Correspondence:
Secção de Bioquímica, CIISA, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária,
Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Av. da Universidade Técnica, Pólo
Universitário do Alto da Ajuda, Lisboa 1300-477, Portugal
© 2013 da Costa et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
da Costa et al. BMC Veterinary Research 2013, 9:118
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/9/118
Background
During the last decades consumers have started demanding animal products of low fat and high polyunsaturated fatty acids content, while maintaining high and
consistent quality [1,2]. To that purpose, research has
been conducted on ruminant’s adipogenesis and lipogenesis in order to improve both the production efficiency
and beef quality. Adipose tissue is involved in the regulation of body homeostasis, particularly in energy metabolism, storage and expenditure. In cattle, fatty acid type
and amount in muscles are directly associated with meat
quality and its value. In fact, subcutaneous and intramuscular adipose tissues are the most important fat
depots concerning meat quality traits. It is desirable that
cattle carcasses have minimal amounts of fat stored in
subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), without a detrimental decrease in intramuscular fat [3]. This can be
achieved only if the regulation of lipid deposition in
intramuscular and other fat depots differs substantially.
Despite being the main site for de novo fatty acid and
triacylglycerols (TAG) synthesis in ruminants [4], the
SAT is also the most energetically inefficient fat depot
and, therefore, considered an economic loss. However,
while during the last decade knowledge of rodents and
human fat physiology has progressed rapidly [5], the
same information regarding ruminant species is very
limited.
The expression level of adipogenic and lipogenic genes
in adipose tissues is regulated by a number of transcription factors [6], whose differential expression is known
to play a key role in lipid metabolism of cattle adipocytes [7]. Adipogenesis, lipogenesis, and lipolysis occur
through the interaction of endogenous genetic mechanisms (mediated through gene expression and regulated
by intrinsic factors), external controls (endocrine agents,
extrinsic factors and nutritional metabolites), as well as
local interactions within cells in a fat depot [8]. Despite
the intricacies of lipogenesis and lipolysis, the role of
some genes has been elucidated and confirmed to be related to fatty acid composition in cattle [6]. Potential
regulatory mechanisms involved in the fatty acid deposition are lipogenic (ACACA, LPL, FABP4 and SCD) and
oxidative (CPT1B and CRAT) genes, as well as transcription regulators (PPARA, PPARG and SREBF1). These
genes have been described [9-11] for their roles and
expression patterns during adipocyte differentiation,
namely in studies comparing the regulation of adipose
tissue deposition in distinct cattle breeds [9,12].
Genetic factors underlying both the deposition and the
turnover of individual fatty acids are not fully understood, although breed has been found to influence beef
fatty acid composition [13]. Fatty acid composition in
meat-producing animals is recognised to have implications on the nutritional and organoleptic properties of
Page 2 of 16
meat, as well as in its technological quality [14]. Ruminant products can be an additional source of the beneficial long-chain n-3 PUFA (EPA and DHA) for human
diets [2] when the consumption of n-3 PUFA-rich foods,
such as fish, is low. In addition, ruminant meats are
major dietary sources of DPA (22:5n-3). Thus, genetic
selection and breeding of animals with a desirable meat
fatty composition may provide a source of beneficial
fatty acids for human consumption [15]. Comparative
differences of beef cattle present a unique resource to
study several aspects of lipid metabolism. In addition to
genetic factors, finishing systems can dramatic (...truncated)