Obstetric Care and Method of Delivery in Mexico: Results from the 2012 National Health and Nutrition Survey
Lozano R (2014) Obstetric Care and Method of Delivery in Mexico: Results from the 2012 National
Health and Nutrition Survey. PLoS ONE 9(8): e104166. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104166
Obstetric Care and Method of Delivery in Mexico: Results from the 2012 National Health and Nutrition Survey
Ileana Heredia-Pi 0
Edson E. Servan-Mori 0
Veronika J. Wirtz 0
Leticia Avila-Burgos 0
Rafael Lozano 0
Josef Neu, University of Florida, United States of America
0 1 National Institute of Public Health , Cuernavaca, Morelos , Mexico , 2 Center for Global Health and Development, Boston University , Boston , Massachusetts, United States of America, 3 Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation , Seattle, Washington , United States of America
Objective: To identify the current clinical, socio-demographic and obstetric factors associated with the various types of delivery strategies in Mexico. Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional study based on the 2012 National Health and Nutrition Survey (ENSANUT) of 6,736 women aged 12 to 49 years. Delivery types discussed in this paper include vaginal delivery, emergency cesarean section and planned cesarean section. Using bivariate analyses, sub-population group differences were identified. Logistic regression models were applied, including both binary and multinomial outcome variables from the survey. The logistic regression results identify those covariates associated with the type of delivery. Results: 53.1% of institutional births in the period 2006 through 2012 were vaginal deliveries, 46.9% were either a planned or emergency cesarean sections. The highest rates of this procedure were among women who reported a complication during delivery (OR: 4.21; 95%CI: 3.66-4.84), between the ages of 35 and 49 at the time of their last child birth (OR: 2.54; 95%CI: 2.02-3.20) and women receiving care through private healthcare providers during delivery (OR: 2.36; 95%CI: 1.843.03). Conclusions: The existence of different socio-demographic and obstetric profiles among women who receive care for vaginal or cesarean delivery, are supported by the findings of the present study. The frequency of vaginal delivery is higher in indigenous women, when the care provider is public and, in women with two or more children at time of the most recent child birth. Planned cesarean deliveries are positively associated with years of schooling, a higher socioeconomic level, and higher age. The occurrence of emergency cesarean sections is elevated in women with a diagnosis of a health issue during pregnancy or delivery, and it is reduced in highly marginalized settings.
-
There are many factors that contribute to the decision to deliver
either vaginally or through a cesarean section in a health facility.
According to the conceptual framework proposed by Freitas [1],
these levels include the individual socio-demographic and cultural
characteristics of the woman, her obstetric and prenatal care
history, her preferences, as well as the circumstances at the time of
admission to a facility and throughout the delivery process. Factors
within the facility are staff member training and general facility
characteristics [1,2].
In recent decades, the number of deliveries within health care
facilities in Mexico has increased, from 78.7% in 1990 to 94.1%
and 95.1% in 2010 and 2012, respectively [3,4]. During the same
time period, the percentage of pregnancies ending in a cesarean
section delivery has risen markedly [5]. This trend is present in
both private and public health facilities across the country. Mexico
has one of the highest cesarean delivery rates internationally [68].
According to the OECD, in 2011 Mexico was the member
country with the highest rate of cesarean sections (49 cesarean
sections/100 deliveries) [5,8]. UNICEF estimations for 2012
confirmed this, from 2006 to 2010, Mexico had the second
highest rate of cesarean sections within the Americas, with 43
cesarean sections per 100 deliveries. This rate was only surpassed
by Brazil with a rate of 50/100 deliveries [9].
The trend of increasing reliance on cesarean sections is not
exclusive to Mexico, rather, it is a global public health issue
especially relevant to low and middle income countries with low
health budgets compared to high income countries [1014].
Concern about the overreliance on cesarean section is based on,
first, the association between the procedure and both maternal and
fetal medical complications and second, the higher expenditure
which does not result in better health outcomes [15]. Cesarean
sections are associated with increased neonatal mortality (OR: 1.7;
95%CI: 1.32.2 for intra-delivery cesarean section and OR: 1.9;
95%CI: 1.52.6 for elective cesarean section, both compared to
vaginal delivery), respiratory complications and neurological
deficits in newborn infants. Beyond the health complications for
the infant, cesarean sections are also associated with increased
maternal morbidity and mortality as well as posing a risk for
complications in future pregnancies (OR: 2.0; 95%CI: 1.62.5 for
intra-delivery cesarean section and OR: 2.3; 95%CI: 1.73.1 for
elective cesarean section, both compared to vaginal delivery) [15].
The financial burden of cesarean sections on the health system is
high, with greater utilization of medical personnel resources
related to the surgical procedure compared to a vaginal delivery
[16].
Previous studies have documented factors associated with
vaginal delivery or cesarean section. On the demand side,
individual characteristics of the women (demographic,
socioeconomic status, type of medical insurance, obstetric history, etc.) are
very important, whereas on the supply side, associated factors are
type of health institution (public or private), availability of new
technologies at the medical units (utilization of the cardiac fetal
electronic monitoring, blood transfusions, antibiotics, etc.), clinical
staff available at the health unit (obstetricians, anesthetists, etc.),
and others [1118].
Health facility statistics have historically been the primary
source of information used to study the prevalence of different
delivery methods. However, the mothers socio-demographic
characteristics and the obstetric factors that influence the delivery
strategy have not yet been thoroughly investigated through
population surveys in Mexico [1318]. This is a cross-sectional
study based on the 2012 National Health and Nutrition Survey
(ENSANUT) with the objective to identify the current clinical,
socio-demographic and obstetric factors associated with the
various types of delivery strategies in Mexico.
Materials and Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted based on the data
collected through the 2012 National Health and Nutrition Survey
(ENSANUT), a probabilistic survey that is representative at the
national and state level, as well as by urban/rural stratum. The
data for the analysis were requested and obtained from the surveys
public repository hosted at the Nati (...truncated)