Mortality Risk and Survival in the Aftermath of the Medieval Black Death
Citation: DeWitte SN (
Mortality Risk and Survival in the Aftermath of the Medieval Black Death
Sharon N. DeWitte 0
Andrew Noymer, University of California, United States of America
0 Department of Anthropology, University of South Carolina , Columbia, South Carolina , United States of America
The medieval Black Death (c. 1347-1351) was one of the most devastating epidemics in human history. It killed tens of millions of Europeans, and recent analyses have shown that the disease targeted elderly adults and individuals who had been previously exposed to physiological stressors. Following the epidemic, there were improvements in standards of living, particularly in dietary quality for all socioeconomic strata. This study investigates whether the combination of the selective mortality of the Black Death and post-epidemic improvements in standards of living had detectable effects on survival and mortality in London. Samples are drawn from several pre- and post-Black Death London cemeteries. The preBlack Death sample comes from the Guildhall Yard (n = 75) and St. Nicholas Shambles (n = 246) cemeteries, which date to the 11th-12th centuries, and from two phases within the St. Mary Spital cemetery, which date to between 1120-1300 (n = 143). The St. Mary Graces cemetery (n = 133) was in use from 1350-1538 and thus represents post-epidemic demographic conditions. By applying Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Gompertz hazard model to transition analysis age estimates, and controlling for changes in birth rates, this study examines differences in survivorship and mortality risk between the pre- and post-Black Death populations of London. The results indicate that there are significant differences in survival and mortality risk, but not birth rates, between the two time periods, which suggest improvements in health following the Black Death, despite repeated outbreaks of plague in the centuries after the Black Death.
-
Funding: Data collection was supported by funding from NSF (www.nsf.gov; BCS-1261682), the Wenner-Gren Foundation (wwww.wennergren.org; grant
#8247), and the American Association of Physical Anthropologists (www.physanth.org). Preliminary analyses were conducted during a summer fellowship at the
School for Advanced Research, sponsored by the Ethel-Jane Westfeldt Bunting Foundation (www.sarweb.org). The funders had no role in study design, data
collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing Interests: The author has declared that no competing interests exist.
The Black Death was one of the most devastating epidemics in
human history. It was the first outbreak of medieval plague in
Europe, and it killed tens of millions of people, an estimated 3050
percent of the European population, between 13471351 [13].
This massive, extremely rapid depopulation event initiated or
enhanced social, demographic, and economic changes throughout
Europe, and thus has attracted the interest of a variety of
researchers for decades [2,4,5]. Previous bioarchaeological
research, using individuals buried in the East Smithfield Black
Death cemetery from London, examined the selectivity of Black
Death mortality, i.e. whether the medieval epidemic targeted
particular individuals or whether, as is often assumed given its very
high mortality levels, it killed indiscriminately. The results of this
research indicated that people varied in their risks of dying during
the Black Death [68]. In particular, older adults appear to have
been more likely to die during the epidemic than their younger
peers. Analysis of skeletal markers of physiological stress (short
adult stature, enamel hypoplasia, tibial periosteal lesions, cribra
orbitalia and porotic hyperostosis), which have been shown under
conditions of normal, non-epidemic medieval morality to be
associated with elevated risks of mortality [8,9], revealed that
people of all ages (not just the elderly) who were already in poor
health (i.e. those who had been exposed to physiological stressors
and had developed skeletal stress markers as a result) before the
Black Death subsequently faced higher risks of death during the
epidemic than their healthier peers. Thus, despite its incredibly
high levels of mortality, the Black Death was, like most normal
causes of death, a selective killer.
Given that the mortality associated with the Black Death was
extraordinarily high and selective, the medieval epidemic might
have powerfully shaped patterns of health and demography in the
surviving population, producing a post-Black Death population
that differed in many significant ways, at least over the short term,
from the population that existed just before the epidemic. By
targeting frail people of all ages, and killing them by the hundreds
of thousands within an extremely short period of time, the Black
Death might have represented a strong force of natural selection
and removed the weakest individuals on a very broad scale within
Europe. In particular, given that reproductive-aged individuals
with relatively high frailty (i.e. an individuals risk of death relative
to other members of the population [10]) were more likely to die
during the Black Death than their age-peers with lower frailty, the
epidemic might have affected genetic variation with respect to
disease susceptibility or immune competence and thus, acted to
reduce average levels of frailty in the surviving population. This
might explain why, according to historical documents, medieval
plague mortality declined steeply between the initial outbreak in
13471351 and the second outbreak in 1361 and why mortality
levels remained lower in subsequent plague outbreaks throughout
the medieval and early modern periods [1113]. Perhaps people
who survived the Black Death and their descendants were
generally less frail and less likely to die from a variety of causes
(including plague) compared to the pre-epidemic population
because of heightened immune responses or reduced disease
susceptibility, i.e. traits that were selectively favored during the
epidemic. If this was the case, it is possible that the Black Death
had positive (though perhaps short-lived) effects on
populationlevel patterns of health and survival.
Observed decreases in mortality levels during medieval plague
epidemics after the Black Death might reflect molecular changes in
the pathogen responsible for the epidemic, and subsequent plague
outbreaks, that rendered it less virulent rather than reflecting
changes in health and susceptibility within the human host
population. Recent molecular analyses of bone and tooth samples
of people who died during the Black Death have yielded DNA
from the causative pathogen of the medieval epidemic, Yersinia
pestis (which continues to affect human populations today by
causing bubonic plague) [1419]. By comparing the genome of
ancient Y. pestis to that of modern strains of the bacterium, such
molecular investigations have the potential to reveal the genetic
determina (...truncated)