DegS and RseP Homologous Proteases Are Involved in Singlet Oxygen Dependent Activation of RpoE in Rhodobacter sphaeroides
et al. (2013) DegS and RseP Homologous Proteases Are Involved in Singlet Oxygen
Dependent Activation of RpoE in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. PLoS ONE 8(11): e79520. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079520
Editor: Rajeev Misra
DegS and RseP Homologous Proteases Are Involved in Singlet Oxygen Dependent Activation of RpoE in Rhodobacter sphaeroides
Aaron M. Nuss 0
Fazal Adnan 0
Lennart Weber 0
Bork A. Berghoff 0
Jens Glaeser 0
Gabriele Klug 0
0 1 Institute of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Giessen University , Giessen, Germany , 2 Department of Molecular Infection Biology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research , Braunschweig, Germany , 3 Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Biomedical Center, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden
Singlet oxygen (1O2) is the main agent of photooxidative stress and is generated by photosensitizers as (bacterio)chlorophylls. It leads to the damage of cellular macromolecules and therefore photosynthetic organisms have to mount an adaptive response to 1O2 formation. A major player of the photooxidative stress response in Rhodobacter sphaeroides is the alternative sigma factor RpoE, which is inactivated under non-stress conditions by its cognate anti-sigma factor ChrR. By using random mutagenesis we identified RSP_1090 to be required for full activation of the RpoE response under 1O2 stress, but not under organic peroxide stress. In this study we show that both RSP_1090 and RSP_1091 are required for full resistance towards 1O2. Moreover, we revealed that the DegS and RseP homologs RSP_3242 and RSP_2710 contribute to 1O2 resistance and promote ChrR proteolysis. The RpoE signaling pathway in R. sphaeroides is therefore highly similar to that of Escherichia coli, although very different anti-sigma factors control RpoE activity. Based on the acquired results, the current model for RpoE activation in response to 1O2 exposure in R. sphaeroides was extended.
-
Light and oxygen in combination with a photosensitizer lead
to the formation of toxic singlet oxygen (1O2). The
photosensitizer absorbs light and transfers energy to molecular
oxygen, causing a spin conversion of an electron, thereby
forming the highly reactive 1O2 [1]. Excess of 1O2 is toxic for the
cell, as it can react with macromolecules like proteins, lipids
and nucleic acids [2,3]. The cell needs to respond to this so
called photooxidative stress to prevent cellular damages which
consequently would lead to cell death.
Facultative photosynthetic -proteobacteria like Rhodobacter
sphaeroides induce the formation of the photosynthetic
apparatus when the oxygen tension in the environment
decreases. The synthesized bacteriochlorophyll molecules and
their precursors can act as potent cellular photosensitizers.
Nevertheless, even when photosynthetic pigments are highly
abundant in the cell, R. sphaeroides grows well in the presence
of light and oxygen. The presence of carotenoids protects
against 1O2 caused damages and in addition, R. sphaeroides
mounts a molecular response to 1O2 exposure, which is
independent of carotenoids [4,5]. This response partly depends
on the alternative group IV sigma factor RpoE. RpoE is
inactivated by forming a stable complex with its cognate
antisigma factor ChrR in a 1:1 stoichiometry [6,7]. When R.
sphaeroides cells are exposed to 1O2, the RpoE:ChrR complex
dissociates, RpoE binds to the RNA polymerase and induces
the expression of target genes [4,6]. When the crystal structure
of the RpoE:ChrR complex was solved it was shown that the
zinc containing anti-sigma domain (ASD) of ChrR is necessary
for the interaction with RpoE [7]. The ASD is conserved in
many bacterial anti-sigma factors [7]. A second zinc containing
ChrR domain, the cupin like domain (CLD), is necessary for
activation of RpoE by 1O2. It was proposed that amino acid side
chains or a ligand in the ChrR-CLD are targets of unknown
chemical modification by 1O2 that lead to dissociation of the
RpoE:ChrR complex [7]. The CLD could also play a role in
promoting an association of the RpoE:ChrR complex with the
photosynthetic membrane, the main source of 1O2 generation
[8].
In bacteria one mechanism of sigma factor activation is the
proteolysis of the cognate anti-sigma factor. In the Gram
Figure 1. Genetic organization of the RSP_1091-1087 and rpoEchrR operons on the R. sphaeroides chromosome 1. The
insertion site of Tn5 which resulted in reduced RpoE activity is indicated. The Tn5 inserted 683 bp downstream of the start codon of
the RSP_1090 gene. RSP_1090 located in a putative operon with RSP_1091, RSP_1089, RSP_1088 and RSP_1087. Both
operons are preceded by an RpoE dependent promoter. Annotated protein functions are depicted below the locus tag numbers.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079520.g001
negative bacterium Escherichia coli, the alternative sigma
factor E (also known as RpoE) is inactivated by the binding of
its cognate anti-sigma factor RseA, which is membrane
localized. Under cell envelope stress conditions, RseA is
stepwise proteolyzed, thus RpoE is released and can bind to
the RNA polymerase [9]. Interestingly, the N-terminal ASD of
ChrR and RseA are similar in structure, but not in amino acid
sequence [7,10].
Homologs of the RpoE:ChrR complex can be found in many
-, - and -proteobacteria [11]. In the -proteobacterium
Caulobacter crescentus RpoE activity is not only induced by
1O2, but also by exposure to organic peroxide
(tert-butylhydroperoxide, tBOOH), cadmium and UV-A irradiation [12].
Specific amino acid residues in the anti-sigma factor ChrR may
be required for the specific response to either 1O2, organic
peroxide and UV-A irradiation or cadmium [12].
The R. sphaeroides RpoE regulon is well defined, but the
exact mechanism of RpoE:ChrR dissociation is still unknown.
Recent work reported that the anti-sigma factor ChrR is
degraded in the presence of 1O2 and tBOOH [13,14], but the
proteases involved in ChrR proteolysis are yet unknown. This
motivated us to search for factors that are involved in RpoE
activation under photooxidative stress. A Tn5 mutagenesis of
the R. sphaeroides wild type revealed that insertion of Tn5 into
the RSP_1090 generated a strain highly sensitive to 1O2.
Consequently, we investigated the impact of genes encoded in
the RSP_1091-1087 operon in the photooxidative stress
response and showed that RSP_1090 affects the stability of
ChrR. In E. coli the proteases DegS and RseP are involved in
proteolysis of the RpoE anti-sigma factor RseA. Because the
Tn5 mutagenesis did not reveal 1O2 sensitive protease-mutants
in R. sphaeroides and the RSP_1090 product has no homology
to proteases, the DegS and RseP homologs RSP_3242 and
RSP_2710 were deleted in R. sphaeroides in order to elucidate
if these proteases are involved in ChrR degradation and RpoE
activation. Our results support a function of these proteases in
singlet oxygen-dependent proteolysis of ChrR. Therefore,
central factors involved in RpoE activation are shared between
R. sphaeroides and E. coli despite the (...truncated)