Illness Perception and Clinical Treatment Experiences in Patients with M. Maroteaux-Lamy (Mucopolysaccharidosis Type VI) and a Turkish Migration Background in Germany
Plo ckinger U (2013) Illness Perception and Clinical Treatment Experiences in Patients with M. Maroteaux-Lamy
(Mucopolysaccharidosis Type VI) and a Turkish Migration Background in Germany. PLoS ONE 8(6): e66804. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066804
Illness Perception and Clinical Treatment Experiences in Patients with M. Maroteaux-Lamy (Mucopolysaccharidosis Type VI) and a Turkish Migration Background in Germany
Hansjo rg Dilger 0
Linn Leissner 0
Lenka Bosanska 0
Christina Lampe 0
Ursula Plockinger 0
Francesc Palau, Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid - Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia, Spain
0 1 Institute of Social and Cultural Antropology, Freie Universita t Berlin , Berlin, Germany , 2 Centre of Excellence for Rare Metabolic Diseases, Interdisciplinary Centre of Metabolism , Campus Virchow-Klinikum , Charite -Universita tsmedizin Berlin , Berlin, Germany , 3 Department of Pediatric and Adolecscent Medicine, Villa Metabolica, University Medical Center Mainz , Mainz , Germany
Introduction: Mucopolysaccharidosis VI (MPS VI) is an inherited lysosomal storage disease caused by a mutation of the gene for arylsulfatase B (ASB). Of the thirty-one patients registered in Germany, almost fifty percent have a Turkish migration background. MPS VI is treated by enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), which is time-consuming and expensive. Methods: This interdisciplinary study explored the illness perceptions and clinical treatment experiences among ten MPS VI patients with a Turkish migration background in two centers for metabolic diseases (Berlin and Mainz, Germany). The clinical treatment situation was observed and semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients and health care personnel, in addition to participatory observation in four patients' everyday environments in Berlin. The data from the interviews, patient records, and personal field notes were encoded, cross-related, and analyzed. Results: Patients' acknowledgement of the disease and coping strategies are influenced predominantly by the perception of their individual health status and the handling of the disease within their family. Patients' willingness to cooperate with treatment strategies is further modified by their knowledge of the disease and the relationships with their health care providers. In this analysis, cultural factors turned out to be marginally relevant. Conclusion: As with other chronic and debilitating diseases, effective treatment strategies have to reach beyond delivering medication. Health care providers need to strengthen the support for patients with a migration background. In this regard, they should respect the patients' cultural and social background and their personal perception of the disease and the therapy. Yet structural and social aspects (clinical setting, family and educational background) may be more crucial here than ''cultural barriers.'' PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org
-
Mucopolysaccharidosis VI (MPS VI) is an inherited lysosomal
storage disease (LSD) caused by a mutation of the arylsulfatase B
(ASB) gene that results in reduced activity of the enzyme ASB. The
incidence of MPS VI varies among different populations and
geographic regions, from 1 in 238,000 (Northern Portugal) to 1 in
1,298,000 (British Columbia, Canada) [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. The
prevalence is estimated to be 1100 patients worldwide [6] [7].
Between 1980 and 1995 thirty-one cases were registered in
Germany. Of these, about fifty percent were patients with a
Turkish migration background [8].
MPS VI is inherited in an autosomal recessive pattern. The high
prevalence in the Turkish population is due to consanguinity, i.e.
intermarriage between cousins, which increases the incidence of
MPS VI in families with a history of the disease [9]. The reduction
of enzyme activity is variable, as is the clinical course of the
disease, currently classified as rapidly or slowly progressing on the
basis of their clinical phenotype and urinary glycosaminoglycan
concentration. While the clinical presentation of patients with
MPS VI demonstrates a continuum of signs and symptoms, a
somewhat stronger genotype/phenotype correlation may be
evident especially in cardiovascular manifestations [10] [11] [12].
The MPS VI phenotype comprises a severe skeletal dysplasia
resulting in short stature and various bone deformations.
Infiltrative cardiomyopathy and respiratory dysfunction are both
due to the storage of glycosaminoglycan (GAG). Corneal opacity
and atrophy of the optic nerve may result in amaurosis, and
conductive and sensorineuronal hearing loss may lead to deafness.
Coarse facial features, the deformation of hands and feet, as well as
short stature are the visible manifestations of the disease and thus
contribute to the mental distress of patients. MPS VI is not
associated with cognitive impairment and is clinically
heterogeneous (Table 1). There are large variations with regard to the age
of onset, organ systems affected, and the severity of the disease. In
addition, the rate of disease progression varies widely.
Since 2006, enzyme replacement therapy (ERT, Naglazyme H)
has been available for the treatment of patients with MPS VI.
ERT has to be given intravenously, is generally well tolerated, and
has shown to improve some aspects of MPS VI and may attenuate
disease progression [13] [14].
ERT infusions take up to five hours per week. This is felt as an
inappropriate burden by some patients and they fail to adhere to
the treatment schedule. However, therapeutic efficacy may well
depend on regular and continuous therapy. An irregular treatment
schedule resulting in sub-optimal dosage may significantly reduce
the drugs therapeutic efficacy, though as no biomarkers are
available to estimate therapeutic efficacy, the effect of suboptimal
dosage over time on the progression of the disease is difficult to
estimate.
In short, repeatedly missed ERT may jeopardize therapeutic
efficacy and put patients at risk. The subsequent lack of positive
effects from irregular ERT may also potentiate patients feeling of
the treatment being cumbersome yet inefficient. In addition,
within the clinical setting, patients reduced cooperation with the
therapeutic schedule may become a source of potential tension
between health care providers and patients. Medical professionals
might perceive non-adherence to ERT as a waste of
considerable health care resources for a non-cooperating patient, as well
as displaying a disregard for their efforts to provide adequate care.
Patients, on the other hand, may not always understand the
medical importance of the treatment and the implications of
missed ERT, and may thus perceive any discussion about their
cooperation as unjustified.
In spite of these obstacles to care, there has been no research
into the illness perception and treatment experiences of patients
with MPS VI and the ways in which their therapeutic experiences
affect the course and acceptance of therapy. This issue may be
even more importan (...truncated)