Factors That Affect Quality of Life among People Living with HIV Attending an Urban Clinic in Uganda: A Cohort Study
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Factors That Affect Quality of Life among
People Living with HIV Attending an Urban
Clinic in Uganda: A Cohort Study
Doris Mutabazi-Mwesigire1¤*, Achilles Katamba1☯¤, Faith Martin2☯, Janet Seeley3☯,
Albert W. Wu4☯
1 Department of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda,
2 Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom, 3 Research Unit on AIDS, Medical
Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda, 4 Department of Health Policy and
Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of
America
☯ These authors contributed equally to this work.
¤ Current Address: Department of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala,
Uganda
*
OPEN ACCESS
Citation: Mutabazi-Mwesigire D, Katamba A, Martin
F, Seeley J, Wu AW (2015) Factors That Affect
Quality of Life among People Living with HIV
Attending an Urban Clinic in Uganda: A Cohort Study.
PLoS ONE 10(6): e0126810. doi:10.1371/journal.
pone.0126810
Academic Editor: Stefano Federici, University of
Perugia, ITALY
Received: August 6, 2014
Accepted: April 8, 2015
Published: June 3, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Mutabazi-Mwesigire et al. This is
an open access article distributed under the terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original
author and source are credited.
Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are
within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The work was supported by Training
Health Researchers into Vocational Excellence
(THRiVE) in East Africa, grant number 087540,
funded by Wellcome Trust. This work was made
possible by Medical Education for Equitable Services
to All Ugandans, a Medical Education Partnership
Initiative, grant number 5R24TW008886, from the
Office of Global AIDS Coordinator and the U. S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Health
Resources and Services Administration, and National
Abstract
Introduction
With the availability of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and primary general care for people living
with HIV (PLHIV) in resource limited settings, PLHIV are living longer, and HIV has been
transformed into a chronic illness. People are diagnosed and started on treatment when they
are relatively well. Although ART results in clinical improvement, the ultimate goal of treatment is full physical functioning and general well-being, with a focus on quality of life rather
than clinical outcomes. However, there has been little research on the relationship of specific
factors to quality of life in PLHIV. The objective of this study was to investigate factors associated with quality of life among PLHIV in Uganda receiving basic care and those on ART.
Methods
We enrolled 1274 patients attending an HIV outpatient clinic into a prospective cohort
study. Of these, 640 received ART. All were followed up at 3 and 6 months. Health related
quality of life was assessed with the MOS-HIV Health Survey and the Global Person Generated Index (GPGI). Multivariate linear regression and logistic regression with generalized
estimating equations were used to examine the relationship of social behavioral and disease factors with Physical Health Summary (PHS) score, Mental Health Summary (MHS)
score, and GPGI.
Results
Among PLHIV receiving basic care, PHS was associated with: sex (p=0.045) - females had
lower PHS; age in years at enrollment (p=0.0001) - older patients had lower PHS; and
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0126810 June 3, 2015
1 / 21
Factors That Affect Quality of Life among People Living with HIV
Institutes of Health. Its contents are solely the
responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily
represent the official views of the government.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared
that no competing interests exist.
depression (p<0.001) - depressed patients had lower PHS. MHS was only associated with
opportunistic infection (p=0.01) - presence of an opportunistic infection was associated with
lower MHS. For the GPG the associated variables were age (p=0.03) - older patients had
lower GPGI; education (p=0.01) – higher education associated with higher GPGI; and depression - patients with depression had a lower GPGI (p<0.001). Among patients on ART,
PHS was associated with: study visit (p=0.01), with increase in time there was better PHS,
and this also improved with increase in education level (p=0.002). Patients with WHO disease stage 3&4 had a lower PHS compared to patients at stage 1&2 (p=0.006), and depressed patients had lower PHS (p<0.001). MHS improved from baseline to six month
study visit (p<0.001), and females had lower MHS compared to males (p=0.01). GPGI was
associated with higher income (p=0.04), alcohol use was associated with lower GPGI
(p=0.004), and depressed patients had a lower GPGI (p<0.001).
Conclusion
Quality of life improved over time for PLHIV on ART. Regardless of treatment status, PLHIV
with depression or low education level and female gender were at risk of having a poor quality of life. Clinicians and policy makers should be aware of these findings, and address them
to improve quality of life for PLHIV.
Introduction
According to Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS, there were 21 million people living
with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa in 2012, of whom 32% received antiretroviral therapy (ART)
[1]. In the same year, it was reported that Uganda had 1.4 million (1.2–1.6 million) adults living
with HIV [2]. By June 2013, 524,603 (37%) adults were on ART [3]. Uganda has had a generalized HIV epidemic for the last 30 years. The HIV prevalence is estimated to be 7.3% [4]. This
represents an increase from 6.4% from the 2005 sero-survey [5], which may reflect earlier diagnosis and increased life expectancy of people living with HIV (PLHIV) to a rate similar to the
general population [6]. HIV/AIDS has been transformed into a chronic condition, albeit one
with no cure, making it important to assess determinants of quality of life (QoL) and, if required, improve the QoL of PLHIV.
Assessment of determinants of QoL is vital to understanding the impact of both HIV and
ART on people’s lives [6]. Progress has been made in assessing QoL among PLHIV in developed countries and QoL outcomes have been used in decision making about ARV regimens
[7,8,9,10,11]. A recent literature review of determinants of QoL among PLHIV in developed
countries reported the following factors to be associated with QoL: gender, age, family situation, education, employment, income, virological and immunological status, staging and
time since diagnosis, ART, presence of symptoms, co morbidity, depression and anxiety, social support, neuro psychological status, health care, disclosure, stigma, smoking, alcohol
use, drug use, adherence and life style and sexual risk behavior [12]. There is limited evidence of determinants of QoL among HIV/AID (...truncated)