Characterization of Ovarian Steroid Patterns in Female African Lions (Panthera leo), and the Effects of Contraception on Reproductive Function
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Characterization of Ovarian Steroid Patterns
in Female African Lions (Panthera leo), and
the Effects of Contraception on Reproductive
Function
Sarah B. Putman1,2, Janine L. Brown1, Ashley D. Franklin1,3, Emily C. Schneider1,4, Nicole
P. Boisseau1, Cheryl S. Asa5, Budhan S. Pukazhenthi1*
1 Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Front Royal, Virginia, United States of America, 2 George
Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, United States of America, 3 Point Defiance Zoo and Aquarium, Tacoma,
Washington, United States of America, 4 Shady Grove Fertility, Rockville, Maryland, United States of
America, 5 AZA Wildlife Contraception Center, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America
*
OPEN ACCESS
Citation: Putman SB, Brown JL, Franklin AD,
Schneider EC, Boisseau NP, Asa CS, et al. (2015)
Characterization of Ovarian Steroid Patterns in
Female African Lions (Panthera leo), and the Effects
of Contraception on Reproductive Function. PLoS
ONE 10(10): e0140373. doi:10.1371/journal.
pone.0140373
Editor: Nei Moreira, Federal University of Parana
(UFPR)—Campus Palotina, BRAZIL
Received: March 30, 2015
Accepted: September 24, 2015
Published: October 13, 2015
Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all
copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed,
transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used
by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made
available under the Creative Commons CC0 public
domain dedication.
Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are
within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by ASLAN Fund
National Zoo and Ritz Carlton. The funders had no
role in study design, data collection and analysis,
decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Abstract
Because of poor reproduction after the lifting of an 8-year breeding moratorium, a biomedical survey of female lions in U.S. zoos was initiated in 2007. Fecal estrogen (FEM), progestagen (FPM) and glucocorticoid (FGM) metabolites were analyzed in samples collected 3–4
times per wk from 28 lions at 17 facilities (0.9–13.8 yr of age) for 4 mo—3.5 yr and body
weights were obtained ~monthly from 17 animals at eight facilities (0.0–3.0 yr of age).
Based on FEM, estrous cycle length averaged 17.5 ± 0.4 d in duration, with estrus lasting
4.4 ± 0.2 d. All but one female exhibited waves of estrogenic activity indicative of follicular
activity; however, not all females expressed estrous behaviors (73%), suggesting silent
estrus was common. Female lions experienced puberty earlier than expected; waves of
estrogenic activity were observed as young as 1.1 yr of age, which may be related to a
faster growth rate of captive vs. wild lions. Mean gestation length was 109.5 ± 1.0 d,
whereas the non-pregnant luteal phase was less than half (46.0 ± 1.2 d). Non-mating
induced increases in FPM were observed in 33% of females housed without a male, consistent with spontaneous ovulation. A number of study animals had been contracepted, and
the return to cyclicity after treatment withdrawal, while variable, was ~4.0 yr and longer than
the 1-yr expected efficacy, especially for those implanted with Suprelorin. For FGM, there
were no differences in overall, baseline or peak mean concentrations among the age
groups or across seasons, nor were there any relationships between reproductive parameters and FGM concentrations. Overall, results suggest that poor reproduction in lions after
the breeding moratorium was not related to altered adrenal or ovarian steroid activity, but
for some females may have been a consequence of individual institutions’ management
decisions.
Competing Interests: The authors received funding
from Ritz Carlton, a for-profit organization. The
funders did not have any influence on content or
interpretation of the data presented in this
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0140373 October 13, 2015
1 / 27
Female African Lion Endocrinology and Effects of Contraception
manuscript. Hence, this does not alter the authors'
adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data
and materials.
Introduction
Globally, African lions (Panthera leo) are listed as vulnerable with a decreasing population
trend [1], although in western and central Africa, lions are considered endangered [2]. In 2004,
the total number of lions in Africa was estimated to be 16,000–30,000 individuals, a reduction
of >97% over a 200-year period [3]. Today, only seven countries in Africa have more than
1,000 lions [4] and most populations exist only in small areas of dry forests, grasslands and
protected reserves [5,6]. Pressures from persecution [7,8], disease [9,10] and habitat loss [11]
are main causes of wild lion population declines. Conserving this species long-term likely will
require improved in situ management in combination with establishing ex situ ‘insurance’ populations as part of overall conservation efforts [12,13]. Natural mating is an important aspect
of captive breeding, but when that fails or more intensive genetic management is needed, zoos
often rely on assisted reproductive technologies (ART), like artificial insemination (AI) and in
vitro fertilization (IVF). To do so, a thorough knowledge of species reproductive mechanisms
is required so that species-specific protocols can be developed [14–17].
Female lion reproductive biology appears to be similar to other Felidae in that females
exhibit variable estrous cycle lengths, non-pregnant luteal phases (NPLP) that are shorter than
the length of a pregnancy, and they are considered induced ovulators but can ovulate spontaneously [18]. Historically, African lions have bred relatively well in captivity [19–21], especially
when compared to other felids [22–26]. As a result, reproduction has often exceeded available
space. In one instance, between ~1990 and 1998, the North American African Lion Species
Survival Plan (SSP) program instituted a breeding moratorium to better manage animal spaces,
as well as to remove African/Asiatic hybrids and individuals of unknown pedigree from the
breeding population. New founders were imported from Africa to bolster the genetics of the
population. However, after the moratorium was lifted in 1999, the captive population experienced a 6-year period of low fecundity. Only 35.4% of reproductive-age females produced offspring between 1999 and 2005, compared to 68% between 1990 and 1998 [27] when breeding
was limited to new founders. Thus, in 2007, the SSP requested a reproductive assessment of
both male and female lions, including gonadal hormone activity, to determine underlying
causes of poor reproduction.
At that time, surprisingly little was known about lion endocrine function. The majority of
extant studies were based on behavioral observations only [28,29]. Few had collected biological
data and these involved only a small number of captive animals [30,31], post-mortem examinations of culled individuals in the wild [32] or short-term (< 3 hr) blood sampling [33]. Wit (...truncated)