Movements, Home Range and Site Fidelity of Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus) within a Temperate Marine Protected Area
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Movements, Home Range and Site Fidelity of
Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus) within a
Temperate Marine Protected Area
David Harasti1*, Kate A. Lee2, Christopher Gallen1, Julian M. Hughes3, John Stewart3
1 Fisheries Research, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Nelson Bay, NSW, 2315, Australia,
2 Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Sydney, Australia, 3 New South
Wales Department of Primary Industries, Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, New South Wales,
2088, Australia
a11111
*
Abstract
OPEN ACCESS
Citation: Harasti D, Lee KA, Gallen C, Hughes JM,
Stewart J (2015) Movements, Home Range and Site
Fidelity of Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus) within a
Temperate Marine Protected Area. PLoS ONE
10(11): e0142454. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142454
Editor: Fabiano L. Thompson, Universidade Federal
do Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL
Received: June 22, 2015
Accepted: October 20, 2015
Published: November 6, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Harasti et al. This is an open
access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original author and source are
credited.
Data Availability Statement: Raw data from the
acoustic listening stations are accessible from the
Australian Animal Tracking and Monitoring System
National Database available at: https://aatams.emii.
org.au/aatams/ <https://aatams.emii.org.au/aatams/>.
Understanding the movement dynamics of marine fish provides valuable information that
can assist with species management, particularly regarding protection within marine protected areas (MPAs). We performed an acoustic tagging study implemented within the Port
Stephens-Great Lakes Marine Park on the mid-north coast of New South Wales, Australia,
to assess the movement patterns, home range and diel activity of snapper (Chrysophrys
auratus; Sparidae); a species of significant recreational and commercial fishing importance
in Australia. The study focused on C. auratus movements around Cabbage Tree Island,
which is predominantly a no-take sanctuary zone (no fishing), with an array of acoustic stations deployed around the island and adjacent reefs and islands. Thirty C. auratus were
tagged with internal acoustic tags in November 2010 with their movements recorded until
September 2014. Both adult and juvenile C. auratus were observed to display strong site
fidelity to Cabbage Tree Island with a mean 12-month residency index of 0.83 (range = 0
low to 1 high). Only three fish were detected on acoustic receivers away from Cabbage
Tree Island, with one fish moving a considerable distance of ~ 290 kms over a short time
frame (46 days). The longest period of residency recorded at the island was for three fish
occurring regularly at the site for a period of 1249 days. Chrysophrys auratus displayed
strong diurnal behaviour and detection frequency was significantly higher during the day
than at night; however, there was no significant difference in detection frequency between
different hours. This study demonstrates that even small-scale protected areas can benefit
C. auratus during multiple life-history stages as it maintains a small home range and displays strong site fidelity over a period of 3 years.
Funding: This study was supported by NSW
Recreational Fishing Trust (Project DPI60) (to JS).
The funders had no role in study design, data
collection and analysis, decision to publish, or
preparation of the manuscript.
Introduction
Competing Interests: The authors have declared
that no competing interests exist.
During the past century, tagging of marine fish has provided information on short-term movements and species home ranges [1], and given an insight into large scale migrations of various
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0142454 November 6, 2015
1 / 20
Movements of Snapper within a Small-Sized MPA
species [2–4]. Monitoring of fish movements has been done using various tagging methods,
such as conventional ‘dart and anchor’ and elastomer tags [5–7] and satellite tags [8, 9]. More
recently, the use of acoustic tags has become a core method for assessing fish movements [10].
During the past decade, advancements in acoustic technologies have led to increased battery
life and tag miniaturisation allowing for species to be monitored for much longer periods of
time, providing longer term data sets on movements [11]. Movement data collected from
acoustic tagging studies can be used to determine site fidelity and species home ranges [12–14]
and habitat utilisation [15, 16]. This information may contribute to species protection through
the implementation of fishing closures or designs of protected areas [17, 18].
Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) have been implemented worldwide and play important
roles in management of fisheries resources, conserving marine biodiversity, protection of sensitive habitats and enhancing eco-tourism [19–21]. Numerous studies have shown MPA’s to be
successful in promoting habitat recovery, particularly coral reefs [22, 23], ensuring genetic connectivity [24] and providing economic benefits to local communities through increased tourism and improved fisheries [25–27]. The benefits of MPAs for fish species are well
documented [26, 28], with studies indicating numerous fish species to be more abundant and
larger in size within no-take protected areas than outside [29–32]. MPAs have been successful
in conserving stocks of exploited species and provide benefits to fisheries through the ‘spillover effect’ [27, 33] and larval replacement across protected area boundaries [34–36]. However,
in order for MPAs to be effective in protecting specific fish species, the movement patterns and
home range of these species of interest, must be first determined in order to establish the
appropriate size of an MPA and its location [37, 38]. As some species of fish show ontogenetic
differences in habitat use and movements [5, 39], an understanding of their behaviours across
all life stages is essential.
Many recent studies have used acoustic telemetry to understand the movement dynamics of
fish within MPAs. For example, luderick (Girella tricuspidata: Family Girellidae) were found to
display strong site fidelity on shallow sub-tidal reefs within an MPA in New South Wales, Australia [40]. Similarly, dusky grouper (Epinephelus marginatus: Family Serranidae) were shown
to display strong site fidelity and were regularly detected residing in a MPA for up to five years
in the Azores [41, 42]. Small scale MPAs were found appropriate to protect the habitats and
small home range of the comber (Serranus cabrilla: Family Serranidae) [43], and also the white
sea-bream (Diplodus sargus: Family Sparidae) was observed to increase in abundance and biomass following the recent establishment of a small-sized MPA [44]. Eastern blue groper
(Achoerodus viridis: Family Labridae) were shown to have smaller home ranges in no-take
MPAs than (...truncated)