Effects of Arachidonic Acid Supplementation on Acute Anabolic Signaling and Chronic Functional Performance and Body Composition Adaptations
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Effects of Arachidonic Acid Supplementation
on Acute Anabolic Signaling and Chronic
Functional Performance and Body
Composition Adaptations
a11111
Eduardo O. De Souza1*, Ryan P. Lowery1, Jacob M. Wilson1, Matthew H. Sharp1,
Christopher Brooks Mobley2, Carlton D. Fox2, Hector L. Lopez3, Kevin A. Shields1, Jacob
T. Rauch1, James C. Healy2, Richard M. Thompson2, Jacob A. Ormes1, Jordan M. Joy1,
Michael D. Roberts2
1 Department of Health Sciences and Human Performance, The University of Tampa, Tampa, FL, United
States of America, 2 Molecular and Applied Sciences Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, Auburn University,
Auburn, AL, United States of America, 3 The Center for Applied Health Sciences, 4302 Allen Road, STE 120,
Stow, OH, 44224, United States of America
*
OPEN ACCESS
Citation: De Souza EO, Lowery RP, Wilson JM,
Sharp MH, Mobley CB, Fox CD, et al. (2016) Effects
of Arachidonic Acid Supplementation on Acute
Anabolic Signaling and Chronic Functional
Performance and Body Composition Adaptations.
PLoS ONE 11(5): e0155153. doi:10.1371/journal.
pone.0155153
Editor: Andrew Philp, University of Birmingham,
UNITED KINGDOM
Received: July 7, 2015
Abstract
Background
The primary purpose of this investigation was to examine the effects of arachidonic acid
(ARA) supplementation on functional performance and body composition in trained males.
In addition, we performed a secondary study looking at molecular responses of ARA supplementation following an acute exercise bout in rodents.
Accepted: April 25, 2016
Published: May 16, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 De Souza et al. This is an open
access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original author and source are
credited.
Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are
within the paper.
Funding: This study was funded in part by Molecular
Nutrition TM. The funder provided support by paying
the reagents for the muscle samples analysis.
Molecular Nutrition TM did not have any additional
roles in the study conception, data collection and
analysis, input on the decision to publish or
mannuscript preparation. All the other costs other
than aforementioned were supported by Molecular
and Applied Sciences Laboratory (Auburn University)
Methods
Thirty strength-trained males (age: 20.4 ± 2.1 yrs) were randomly divided into two groups:
ARA or placebo (i.e. CTL). Then, both groups underwent an 8-week, 3-day per week, nonperiodized training protocol. Quadriceps muscle thickness, whole-body composition scan
(DEXA), muscle strength, and power were assessed at baseline and post-test. In the rodent
model, male Wistar rats (~250 g, ~8 weeks old) were pre-fed with either ARA or water (CTL)
for 8 days and were fed the final dose of ARA prior to being acutely strength trained via electrical stimulation on unilateral plantar flexions. A mixed muscle sample was removed from
the exercised and non-exercised leg 3 hours post-exercise.
Results
Lean body mass (2.9%, p<0.0005), upper-body strength (8.7%, p<0.0001), and peak power
(12.7%, p<0.0001) increased only in the ARA group. For the animal trial, GSK-β (Ser9)
phosphorylation (p<0.001) independent of exercise and AMPK phosphorylation after exercise (p-AMPK less in ARA, p = 0.041) were different in ARA-fed versus CTL rats.
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0155153 May 16, 2016
1 / 20
Arachidonic Acid and Resistance Training
and Human Performance Laboratory (University of
Tampa).
Competing Interests: This study was partially
funded by Molecular Nutrition TM. Patent details to
declare: product: 'X-Factor Advanced', patent
number: #6.841.573. There are no further patents,
products in development, or marketed products to
declare. This does not alter the authors' adherence to
all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and
materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that ARA supplementation can positively augment strength-training
induced adaptations in resistance-trained males. However, chronic studies at the molecular
level are required to further elucidate how ARA combined with strength training affect muscle adaptation.
Introduction
Fatty acids supplementation has received a high degree of popularity for increasing health benefits. For instance, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation have been utilized to reduce skeletal muscle inflammation and protein breakdown, as
well as neural and cardiometabolic health [1, 2]. Specifically, one such fatty acid that has garnered a progressive amount of scrutiny over recent years is arachidonic acid (ARA). ARA is
a long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (20:4n-6) that exists in relatively low amounts in the
typical American diet [3]. In this regard, ARA is primarily consumed through meat and fish
products. In the human body, ARA resides in the phospholipid bi-layer of cell membranes at
concentrations contingent upon dietary intake [4]. While the literature illustrates the responsiveness of cell membrane composition to dietary intakes, phospholipids also appear to be
dependent upon activity level suggesting increased ARA turnover or demand. For example,
Andersson et al. (2000) noted a lower n-6:n-3 ratio and lower total n-6 fatty acids in phospholipids of exercising individuals [5, 6]. Likewise, Helge et al. (2001) similarly demonstrated that
a lower n-6:n-3 ratio exists in strength-trained individuals [7].
Furthermore, ARA drives the inflammatory response to strength training [7]. To this end,
this inflammatory response appears to be mediated by ARA liberated from plasma membranes
via phospholipase A2 (PLA2). The free ARA follows its metabolic fate to generate bioactive
lipid mediators known as eicosanoids by one of three biochemical pathways involving lipoxygenases (LOX), P450 epoxygenases or cyclooxygenases (COX) [8]. COX enzyme plays an
important role for converting ARA to form postranoids such as Prostaglandins [9–11]. In addition, Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and Prostaglandin F2-α (PGF2-α) appear to be associated with
protein degradation and synthesis in skeletal muscle, respectively [12]. Moreover, PGF2-α has
been shown to elicit essential pathways responsible for myogenic proliferation, differentiation,
and fusion in vitro [13, 14]. For instance, previous research demonstrated that in vitro ARA
supplementation stimulates prostaglandins release and skeletal muscle hypertrophy via a
COX-2 dependent pathway [9]. Moreover, animal model studies also demonstrated that COXinhibitors consumption attenuates muscle hypertrophy and regrowth from muscle atrophy
[15].
However, in humans, after COX-inhibitors consumption, ARA-derived prostaglandins
have demonstrated conflicting results concerning their role in acute post-strength training
muscle protein synthesis and training-induced adaptations [16, 17]. For instance, previous
research examined (...truncated)