Vol. 28, Sigma, Journal of Political and International Studies
Sigma: Journal of Political and International Studies
Volume 28
Article 8
1-1-2011
Vol. 28, Sigma, Journal of Political and International
Studies
Sigma: Journal of Political and International Studies
Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/sigma
Recommended Citation
Studies, Sigma: Journal of Political and International (2011) "Vol. 28, Sigma, Journal of Political and International Studies," Sigma:
Journal of Political and International Studies: Vol. 28 , Article 8.
Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/sigma/vol28/iss1/8
This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the All Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sigma:
Journal of Political and International Studies by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact
, .
SIGMA
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL AND
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
VOLUME XXVIll . 2011
CONTENTS
David Romney-Middle Eastern studies and Arabic
Comparing Fundamentalisms: A Social Movement Theory Approach
Sean Kelly-political science; Allison Holmes-political science
The Role of Party Identification in a Nonpartisan Election: A Case
Study in Provo, Utah
John David Oark-international relations
Cash, Schools, and Immigrants: The Effects of Income and
Education on Xenophobia in South Africa
David Gerard-political science
The Rise of the Chinese Navy: What the World can Expect
from Asia's Emerging Maritime Power
Kirk Snider-political science; Haley McCormickpolitical science
Branded: The Importance of Names in Politics
Sead Osmani-political science and Italian
NATO's Credibility in the Kosovo War
SIGMA
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL AND
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
VOLUME XXVIII . 2011
CONTENTS
David Romney-Middle Eastern studies and Arabic
Comparing Fundamentalisms: A Social Movement Theory Approach .............................. 1
Sean Kelly-political science; Allison Holmes-political science
The Role of Party Identification in a Nonpartisan Election: A Case Study
in Provo, Utah ...................................................................................................................... 9
John David Clark-international relations
Cash, Schools, and Immigrants: The Effects of Income and Education on
Xenophobia in South Africa ............................................................................................... 25
David Gerard-political science
The Rise of the Chinese Navy: What the World can Expect from Asia's
Emerging Maritime Power ................................................................................................ 43
Kirk Snider-political science; Haley McCormick-political science
Branded: The Importance of Names in Politics ................................................................ 53
Sead Osmani-political science and Italian
NATO's Credibility in the Kosovo War ............................................................................. 65
Comparing Fundamentalisms:
A Social Movement Theory
Approach
David Romney
In the last forty years, the emergence of a number of Islamist and Jewish fundamentalist groups has resulted in a number of comparative studies that try to explain this phenomenon (e.g., Antoun and Hegland 1987; Sivan and Friedman 1990).
Although scholars have argued varying reasons for this recent religious resurgence,
most have recognized the importance of the 1967 Israeli War (Six-Day War) to both
Jewish and Islamist fundamentalist movements. Some of these scholars see the religious resurgence following this war as a continuation of religious sentiments expressed by pre-1967 Zionist and fundamentalist Islamic groups rather than as a new
movement (Davis 1987, 149-52). Others, while stressing the importance of previous
Islamic revivalism, note the 1967 war marked a turning point for both Islamist and
Jewish groups (Esposito 2005, 160-65). Some also see global trends that unite not just
Islamist and Jewish fundamentalist groups but all fundamentalist groups (Keddie
1998). Others take a different tack, claiming Islamic and Jewish fundamentalist movements are actually quite different from each other and only superficially mirror each
other. For instance, Hunter asserts that when compared to Islamic fundamentalism,
Jewish fundamentalism focuses more on the possibility of future failures and the importance of preventing these failures rather than on past grievances or experiences
(1993,31-32). In spite of this research, two basic questions about Islamism and Jewish fundamentalism remain unanswered: 1) What effect has the 1967 War had on the
Islamist and Jewish fundamentalist movements, and 2) Do these movements mirror
each other or have they developed independently?
Using a social movement theory (SMT) approach, I will argue that post-1967 Jewish and Islamic fundamentalist movements mirror each other in a number of crucial
SIGMA
ways. According to SMT, individual political desires are translated into group-based
social movements through the presence of appropriate social movement organizations (SMOs; Wiktorowicz 2004). As outlined by Robinson (2004), the presence and
use of three factors can enhance the viability of an SMO: changes in political opportunity structures, effective mobilizing structures, and correct cultural framing. Robinson and Wiktorowicz have shown how Islamist activist groups can be analyzed under a social movement theory framework, but aside from Munson (2008), no one has
applied this framework to explain Jewish activist groups. In this paper, I will show
post-1967 fundamentalist Jewish movements, like their Islamist counterparts, can be
better understood through SMT. By applying SMT, three ideas are made apparent:
1) The political opportunity structures for both Islamist and Jewish fundamentalist
groups changed as a result of the 1967 war, stimulating the appearance of new SMOs
on both sides after this war, 2) SMOs of both sides have used similar mobilizing structures since the 1967 war, and 3) since the 1967 War, SMOs of both sides have used
cultural framing to address three similar issues: unfaithful coreligionists, the status of
the land of Palestine, and past failures or tragedies.
I will use a purposefully broad definition of fundamentalism for this study. For
the purposes of this paper, I define religious fundamentalist groups as those striving for religious orthodoxy. Although this definition is not specific, it allows me to
look broadly at different fundamentalist movements. In this study, I will focus on
examples from the fundamentalist movements of Hamas, Gush Emunim, and Kach,
all of which conform to this definition of fundamentalism.
The 1967 Israeli War changed the political opportunity structures for Islamist
and Jewish fundamentalist movements. For this study, changes in political opportunity structures are defined according to Robinson's definition: political changes that
alter the opportunities available for an SMO (2004, 123). For Islamist movements,
the capture of the (...truncated)