High-Throughput Nanoindentation for Statistical and Spatial Property Determination

JOM, Feb 2018

Standard nanoindentation tests are “high throughput” compared to nearly all other mechanical tests, such as tension or compression. However, the typical rates of tens of tests per hour can be significantly improved. These higher testing rates enable otherwise impractical studies requiring several thousands of indents, such as high-resolution property mapping and detailed statistical studies. However, care must be taken to avoid systematic errors in the measurement, including choosing of the indentation depth/spacing to avoid overlap of plastic zones, pileup, and influence of neighboring microstructural features in the material being tested. Furthermore, since fast loading rates are required, the strain rate sensitivity must also be considered. A review of these effects is given, with the emphasis placed on making complimentary standard nanoindentation measurements to address these issues. Experimental applications of the technique, including mapping of welds, microstructures, and composites with varying length scales, along with studying the effect of surface roughness on nominally homogeneous specimens, will be presented.

Article PDF cannot be displayed. You can download it here:

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11837-018-2752-0.pdf

High-Throughput Nanoindentation for Statistical and Spatial Property Determination

JOM, Vol. 70, No. 4, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-018-2752-0  2018 The Author(s). This article is an open access publication BEYOND INDENTATION HARDNESS AND MODULUS: ADVANCES IN NANOINDENTATION TECHNIQUES: PART II High-Throughput Nanoindentation for Statistical and Spatial Property Determination ERIC D. HINTSALA,1 UDE HANGEN,2 and DOUGLAS D. STAUFFER 1,3 1.—Bruker Nano Surfaces, Eden Prairie, MN, USA. 2.—Bruker Nano Surfaces, Aachen, Germany. 3.—e-mail: Standard nanoindentation tests are ‘‘high throughput’’ compared to nearly all other mechanical tests, such as tension or compression. However, the typical rates of tens of tests per hour can be significantly improved. These higher testing rates enable otherwise impractical studies requiring several thousands of indents, such as high-resolution property mapping and detailed statistical studies. However, care must be taken to avoid systematic errors in the measurement, including choosing of the indentation depth/spacing to avoid overlap of plastic zones, pileup, and influence of neighboring microstructural features in the material being tested. Furthermore, since fast loading rates are required, the strain rate sensitivity must also be considered. A review of these effects is given, with the emphasis placed on making complimentary standard nanoindentation measurements to address these issues. Experimental applications of the technique, including mapping of welds, microstructures, and composites with varying length scales, along with studying the effect of surface roughness on nominally homogeneous specimens, will be presented. INTRODUCTION Nanoindentation has been proven to be a powerful tool for exploring mechanical behavior at smalllength scales. This is due to the technique being highly localized and only semi-destructive, while simultaneously allowing extraction of a diverse set of properties including elastic, plastic, and fracture. In addition, the sample preparation requirements are significantly less stringent than most other mechanical testing techniques, and the procedures are well established.1–5 However, standard nanoindentation testing requires several minutes per test for tasks such as locating suitable areas, the sample approach, drift correction, and retraction of the tip. This makes certain applications, such as property mapping by indentation grids6,7 or generation of statistical data sets, extremely time consuming and, in some cases, too slow to be practical. Various technologies have been developed in recent years that have greatly accelerated nanoindentation testing, with state-of-the-art speeds of up to 6 indents/ second representing at least two orders of magnitude improvement over standard quasi-static 494 testing. This means that 10,000 indent maps can be completed in less than an hour—for perspective, this would generate a property map of 100 9 100 lm with 1-lm spacing. The speeds, resolution, scan size, and sample preparation requirements are comparable to a variety of SEM mapping techniques, such as electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) and energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS). The fact that they also give highly complementary information means that correlated surveying of microstructural features for their crystallographic, chemical and mechanical properties provides researchers with a powerful tool. Besides this, statistical indentation techniques allow users to quickly determine parameters of significance, screen materials, and identify more global trends from highly localized nanoindentation tests.8 In addition, statistical data sets help combat factors producing data outliers, such as surface roughness,9–12 which are a hindrance to accurate nanoindentation testing. Lastly, these techniques can also be applied to systems with environmental control, such as heating, controlled humidity, or even submerged specimens, providing additional variables to (Published online February 14, 2018) High-Throughput Nanoindentation for Statistical and Spatial Property Determination 495 Fig. 1. (a) Measured hardness of fused quartz after indenter tip area function calibration for three Berkovich indenters of varying tip radii. A dynamic indentation mode with a 0.2-nm displacement amplitude is capable of measuring values for low penetration depths. (b) Comparison of purely elastic and elastic–plastic indents in fused quartz, with inset schematics of the elastic zone (light) and the plastic zone (dark). During elastic indentation in the Hertzian regime the average contact stress is less than that required to initiate plasticity. The elastic–plastic indentation shows hysteresis in the load-depth curve. In this case a constant hardness is observed. explore. To date, hardness mapping has been utilized to explore spatial variations in a variety of materials including cement pastes,13 concrete,14 tooth enamel,15 metal matrix composites,6,7,15,16 intermetallics,17 metal alloys,6,18,19 and wood adhesive bonds.20 However, properly conducting high-speed nanoindentation and interpreting its results requires one to consider various factors, such as indentation spacing, strain rate effects, and indentation depth. In addition, it can currently only be applied to measuring hardness and elastic modulus because of the restrictions on load function choice. Thus, highspeed indentation is not a replacement for standard indentation techniques. Rather, the approach that is advocated is that of a complementary technique for standard indentation, where the standard testing protocol allows one to assess indentation size effects,21–23 rate dependence,24 and spacing effects. Here, we will review these key concepts first before presenting example application data emphasizing property-mapping techniques. EXPERIMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR NANOINDENTATION MAPPING To produce high-quality property maps, consideration of the stress field underneath the indenter tip is critical. Not only is there potential for the damage zones from individual tests to overlap and invalidate the results, but the ‘‘resolution’’ of the nanoindentation test is relevant when testing near boundaries of features, such as grain and phase boundaries, weld zones, composite interfaces, and material gradients, for damage or composition. The indenter resolution needs to be carefully defined, as the stress field occurs in three dimensions and consists of separately sized elastic and plastic zones. A second consideration involves the necessity of high loading rates, which may induce strain rate sensitivity changes in the measured hardness. Both subjects will be covered in the following two sections, ‘‘Indentation Spacing and Resolution’’ and ‘‘Strain Rate Sensitivity’’. Indentation Spacing and Resolution When mapping surface properties, the in-plane spatial resolution is of primary concern; however, defining this requires consideration of the full threedimensional shape of the indentation stress field or the volume of material being tested. Since th (...truncated)


This is a preview of a remote PDF: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11837-018-2752-0.pdf
Article home page: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11837-018-2752-0

Eric D. Hintsala, Ude Hangen, Douglas D. Stauffer. High-Throughput Nanoindentation for Statistical and Spatial Property Determination, JOM, 2018, pp. 494-503, Volume 70, Issue 4, DOI: 10.1007/s11837-018-2752-0