Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis
IDSA GUIDELINES
Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis
and Management of Group A
Streptococcal Pharyngitis
Alan L. Bisno,1 Michael A. Gerber,2 Jack M. Gwaltney, Jr.,3 Edward L. Kaplan,5 and Richard H. Schwartz3.4
1
Department of Medicine, University of Miami School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, Florida; 2 Cincinnati Children’s
Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Ohio; 3University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, 4Inova
Fairfax Hospital for Children, Falls Church, Virginia; and 5Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The objective of this practice guideline is to provide
recommendations for the accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment of group A streptococcal pharyngitis
in children and adults.
The desired outcomes are prevention of acute
rheumatic fever, prevention of suppurative complications, improvement of clinical symptoms and
signs, reduction in transmission of group A bhemolytic streptococci to close contacts of patients,
and minimization of potential adverse effects of inappropriate antimicrobial therapy.
This statement is an update of the practice guideline
published in 1997 [1] and takes into account relevant
research published since that time. A major substantive
change is the acceptance of negative results of rapid
antigen detection testing (RADT) for exclusion of acute
streptococcal pharyngitis, without the previously mandated confirmation with a negative culture result, provided certain criteria are met, as detailed below.
Diagnosis. Acute pharyngitis is one of the most
frequent illnesses for which pediatricians, internists,
and other primary care physicians are consulted. Although the group A streptococcus is the most common
Received 21 March 2002; electronically published 19 June 2002.
These guidelines were developed and issued on behalf of the Infectious
Diseases Society of America.
Reprints or correspondence: Dr. Alan L. Bisno, Medical Service (111), Rm. 1039,
Miami VA Medical Center, 1201 N.W. 16th St., Miami, FL 33125 (abisno
@med.miami.edu).
Clinical Infectious Diseases 2002; 35:113–25
2002 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved.
1058-4838/2002/3502-0001$15.00
bacterial cause of acute pharyngitis, only a small percentage of patients with this condition are infected by
group A streptococci. Moreover, group A streptococcal
pharyngitis is the only commonly occurring form of
acute pharyngitis for which antibiotic therapy is definitely indicated. Therefore, for a patient with acute
pharyngitis, the clinical decision that usually needs to
be made is whether the pharyngitis is attributable to
group A streptococci.
The signs and symptoms of group A streptococcal
and other (most frequently viral) pharyngitides overlap
broadly. Therefore, unless the physician is able with
confidence to exclude the diagnosis of streptococcal
pharyngitis on epidemiological and clinical grounds, a
laboratory test should be done to determine whether
group A streptococci are present in the pharynx. The
test may be either culture of a throat swab specimen
or an RADT, which detects the presence of group A
streptococcal carbohydrate on a throat swab. A positive
result of throat culture or RADT for a patient with
signs and symptoms of acute pharyngitis is considered,
for clinical purposes, to establish the diagnosis of “strep
throat.” However, because some RADTs appear to be
considerably less sensitive than is culture of a throat
swab specimen, a negative RADT result for a child or
adolescent should be confirmed by performance of a
throat culture, unless the physician has ascertained in
his or her practice that the RADT being used is comparable in sensitivity to a throat culture. Because of the
epidemiological features of acute pharyngitis in adults
(e.g., low incidence of streptococcal infection and extremely low risk of rheumatic fever), diagnosis of this
infection in adults on the basis of the results of an
RADT, without confirmation of negative RADT results
Practice Guidelines for Streptococcal Pharyngitis
• CID 2002:35 (15 July) • 113
by negative results of culture, is an acceptable alternative to
diagnosis on the basis of throat culture results (figure 1). The
generally high specificity of RADTs should minimize overprescription of antimicrobials for treatment of adults.
Therapy.
Patients with acute streptococcal pharyngitis
should receive therapy with an antimicrobial agent in a dose
and for a duration that is likely to eradicate the infecting organism from the pharynx. A number of antibiotics have been
shown to be effective in treating group A streptococcal pharyngitis. These include penicillin and its congeners (such as
ampicillin, amoxicillin, and the semisynthetic penicillins), as
well as numerous cephalosporins and macrolides and clindamycin. Penicillin, however, remains the agent of choice because
of its proven efficacy, safety, narrow spectrum, and its low cost.
Amoxicillin is often used in place of oral penicillin V to treat
young children; the efficacy appears to be equal. This choice
is primarily related to acceptance of the taste of the suspension.
Preliminary investigations have demonstrated that once-daily
amoxicillin therapy is effective in the treatment of group A bhemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis [2, 3]. If these results are
confirmed by additional investigations, once-daily amoxicillin
therapy, because of its low cost and relatively narrow spectrum,
could become an alternative regimen to treat group A bhemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis.
Intramuscular administration of benzathine penicillin G is
preferred for patients who are unlikely to complete a full 10day course of oral therapy. Erythromycin is a suitable alternative
for patients allergic to penicillin. First-generation cephalospo-
rins are also acceptable for patients who do not exhibit immediate-type hypersensitivity to b-lactam antibiotics.
Most oral antibiotic therapy must be administered for the
conventional 10 days to achieve maximal rates of pharyngeal
eradication of group A streptococci, but certain newer agents
have been reported to achieve comparable rates of bacteriologic
and clinical cure of streptococcal pharyngitis when administered for ⭐5 days. However, no definitive results from comprehensive studies are available to allow final evaluation of these
proposed shorter courses of oral antibiotic therapy [4], which,
therefore, cannot be recommended at this time. Moreover, these
antibiotics have a much broader spectrum than does penicillin,
and most, even when administered for short courses, are more
expensive.
Except under special circumstances, neither repeat bacteriologic testing (culture or RADT) of patients who are asymptomatic after a course of antimicrobial therapy nor routine
testing of asymptomatic household contacts of a patient with
group A streptococcal pharyngitis is recommended.
A small percentage of patien (...truncated)