Neurological Basis of Dyslexia
PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY BRIEFS
A MONTHLY JOURNAL
REVIEW
J. GORDON MILLICHAP, M.D., F.R.C.P., EDITOR
Vol. 15, No. 1
January 2001
LEARNING AND ATTENTION DISORDERS
NEUROLOGICAL
BASIS
OF
DYSLEXIA
Evidence of a neurological basis for developmental dyslexia is reviewed by
a researcher from the Cognitive Neurology Laboratory, Department of Neurology,
Marseille, france. Beginning with the neuroanatomical findings (cortical
malformations
ectopias and dysplasias, and absence of normal asymmetry of the
planum temporale) of the Boston school (Galaburda et al, 1985, 1989; Cohen et al,
1989), and interhemispheric corpus callosal deficits (Hynd et al, 1995); subsequent
areas of investigation covered include the central role of phonological disorders
(grapheme-to-phoneme conversion deficit) in dyslexia, an insensitivity to
auditory frequency awareness and modulation (Manis et al, 1997); the
demonstration of a visual processing deficit (the 'magnosystem' theory
(Livingston et al, 1991), and 'dyseidetic' (Boder, 1973) subgroup); the 'temporal
(rate)-processing' theory (Tallal and Piercy, 1973), the dyslexics' inability to
process rapidly successive auditory or visual stimuli (a 'dyschromia' (Llinas,
1993)); the contribution of electrophysiological studies (event-related potentials,
mismatch negativity, P300, and N400 (Taylor, 1995)), brain functional imaging
(magnetoencephalography (Salmelin et al, 1996), functional MRI, PET during
phonological tasks), and a working hypothesis and method of remediation based
on the temporal processing deficit theory. Evidence points to a multi-system
deficit related to temporal processing. The brain of dyslexics is unable to process
stimuli presented in rapid succession, which accounts in part for the perceptual,
motor, and cognitive impairments frequently associated with learning disorders.
Recently proposed training methods include acoustically modified speech to
correct the temporal processing deficit described in dyslexics (Merzenich et al,
1996; Tallal et al, 1996). (Habib M. The neurological basis of developmental
dyslexia. An overview and working hypothesis. Brain Dec 2000;123:2373-2399).
-
(Repond: Dr Michel Habib, Centre de recherche, Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie, 4565 Ch
Queen Mary, Montreal (QUE), Canada H3W 1W5).
often
COMMENT. Developmental dyslexia is defined as a neurologically-based,
familial, disorder which interferes with the acquisition and processing of
PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY BRIEFS (ISSN
1043-3155) © 2001 covers selected articles from the
$65 Canada;
- J. Gordon Millichap,
M.D., F.R.C.P.-Editor, P.O. Box 11391, Chicago, Illinois, 60611, USA.
The editor is Pediatric Neurologist at Children's Memorial Hospital and Northwestern
University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois. PNB is a continuing education service designed to
expedite and facilitate review of current scientific information for physicians and other
health professionals. Fax: 312-943-0123. Visit our web site: www.pnbpublishers.com
world literature and is published monthly. Send subscription requests ($63 US;
$73 airmail outside N America) to Pediatric Neurology Briefs
Pediatric Neurology Briefs
2001
1
language. Dyslexia is one of several distinct learning disabilities. It is a specific
language-based disorder of constitutional origin, characterized by difficulties in
single word decoding that reflect insufficient phonological processing. (See
Millichap JG. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity and Learning Disorders. PNB Publ,
Revised 2001, for definitions and references to dyslexia, LD, and ADHD). Several
methods of reading remediation have been reviewed by educators, including
multisensory, modified alphabets, language-experience, individualized reading,
synthetic phonics, linguistic decoding, and phonics systems (Millichap N, 1986).
The multisensory approach to treatment of dyslexia is the most usual remediation
employed by educators (Pavoni B, 2000).
The theory that dyslexia is due to an immaturity of cerebral function is
supported by the pathological and neuroimaging evidence of developmental
cerebral anomalies and electrophysiological studies. The anatomical location of
the anomalies strongly supports the "phonological-linguistic," or deficient
speech sound and decoding theory of dyslexia (Denckla MB, In Progress in
Pediatric Neurology II. PNB Publ, 1994;pl74). The left temporal-parietal area
appears to be most critical in location of normal reading ability, but additional
areas of the left hemisphere may be involved also. Some reports of acquired
dyslexia following surgery on the brain have involved the left frontal lobe. A
"disconnection theory" for dyslexia, involving impaired relays between the
anterior and posterior areas of the left brain, has been proposed based on PET
studies (Paulesu et al, 1996).
Dyslexia occurs in 5 to 10% of school children, at all levels of intelligence,
from superior to low normal. Dyslexia may be an isolated abnormality or may be
associated with other learning disabilities. Reading and spelling disability
overlaps with ADHD and shows similar genetic characteristics but different brain
localizations. Anatomically, left hemisphere deficits underly reading and other
learning disabilities, whereas the right frontal lobe is involved in ADHD.
DEVELOPMENTAL
RISKS
OF
INATTENTIVE
BEHAVIOR
The developmental functioning, social, and environmental backgrounds of
community-based, epidemiological sample of 7-year-old children with pure
inattentive behavior (I-subtype, n=31, 1.3% of sample) were compared to that of
children with pure overactive behavior (HI subtype, n=31) ADHD-Combined type
(n=31) and a control group at the Maudsley Hospital, London, UK. A 2-item
inattention subscale was derived from the Conners' (1969) questionnaire, namely
"Fails to finish things" and "Inattentive, easily distracted." A cutoff score of 3 or
more on these items was employed as the definition of inattentiveness. Other
measures included parent and teacher interviews, general psychometric tests,
Digit Span subtest of the WISC-R, Continuous performance task, paired-associates
learning task, a Matching Familiar Figures Test, and objective measures of
a
attentive behavior.
Inattentive behavior was significantly correlated
need for repeated instructions in school, lower verbal
with low self-esteem and
IQ. and general cognitive
functioning, poor reading scores, and lower language related skills. Whereas the
HI and Combined-ADHD groups showed more conduct and social-interaction
problems, these outcomes were not encountered in the inattentive group. The
fathers of inattentive children were more likely to have a low occupational status.
(Warner-Rogers J, Taylor A, Taylor E, Sandberg S. Iaattentive behavior in
childhood: Epidemiology and implications for development. Trnl of Learning
Nov-Dec 2000;33:520-536). (Respond: Dr Jody Warner-Rogers, Child
Neuropsychiatry Clinic, Children's Outpatient Department, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill,
Disabilities
Pedia (...truncated)