Ancient and Current Chaos Theories
Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems 4(1), 1-18, 2006
ANCIENT AND CURRENT CHAOS THEORIES
Güngör Gündüz
Department of Chemical Engineering, Middle East Technical University
Ankara, Turkey
Regular paper
Received: 8. February, 2006. Accepted: 31. May, 2006.
SUMMARY
Chaos theories developed in the last three decades have made very important contributions to our
understanding of dynamical systems and natural phenomena. The meaning of chaos in the current
theories and in the past is somewhat different from each other. In this work, the properties of
dynamical systems and the evolution of chaotic systems were discussed in terms of the views of
ancient philosophers. The meaning of chaos in Anaximenes’ philosophy and its role in the Ancient
natural philosophy has been discussed in relation to other natural philosophers such as of
Anaximander, Parmenides, Heraclitus, Empedocles, Leucippus (i.e. atomists) and Aristotle. In
addition, the fundamental concepts of statistical mechanics and the current chaos theories were
discussed in relation to the views in Ancient natural philosophy. The roots of the scientific concepts
such as randomness, autocatalysis, nonlinear growth, information, pattern, etc. in the Ancient natural
philosophy were investigated.
KEY WORDS
chaos, randomness, dynamical systems, natural philosophy, ancient philosophy, information,
biological evolution, nonlinearity
CLASSIFICATION
PACS: 01.70.+w, 89.75.-k
*Corresponding author, η: ; (90) 312 210 26 16;
Kimya Mühendisliği Bölümü, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara 06531, Turkey
G. Gündüz
INTRODUCTION
In the last three decades, the chaos theories have born, grown, matured, and revolutionized
our understanding of natural phenomena. Classical physics, statistical physics,
electromagnetism, quantum theory, and relativity also had great revolutionary impacts in
explaining natural phenomena, but none of these had so rapid influence on the fields other
than basic physics. In the past, it usually took some decades for the application of physical laws
in applied sciences and engineering after their discovery. However, chaos theories soon found
applications in almost all branches of technical, medical, and social fields, and also in arts.
The term chaos is first seen in the Sumerian epic of Gilgamesh which is the oldest script
strongly touching the fundamentals of human psychology and human’s understanding of the
earthly and heavenly events. In one of the paragraphs of the epic, the Earth God complains to
other Gods about humans, and says ‘humans have gotten so overcrowded, and they have run
into dearth, starvation, and chaos, and they do not respect me; something has to be done’. Gods
then decided to send water flood to extinct them. The flood of Noah in religious scripts is based
on this story. In terms of chaos current theories, it is true that anything that multiplies can cause
overcrowding and thus chaos, then the components becomes pretty much free from the general
rules (the rules of the system or of Gods) [1]. It is possible to control the chaos, and to get out
from it by external intervention of physical forces, i.e. Gods’ intervention in Gilgamesh epic.
The chaos concept has been a fundamental metaphor for both natural and social events, and
cosmogony in ancient societies. According to a Mesopotamian cosmogony, the conjunction
of male Apsu which represents freshwater and of female Tiamat which represents seawater
gives birth to Goddess Mummu who represents the chaotic fog and clouds. Mummu then gave
birth to primitive ocean and water. First Gods came out from the primitive water, and one of
them then became a creative God and created earth, stars, and all living things [2]. The Sumerians
used to believe that the earth and stars were floating soil on water [3]. Similarly, the Egyptians
also used to believe in that the universe was essentially water, and all stars were surrounded
by water. There is also a phrase in Cor’an stating that the essence of all things is water.
The Egyptians attributed a kind of philosophical meaning to the word chaos and thought that
it is the primordial state before genesis, and it is the medium for the coexistence of form and
structure. It is in fact a kind of reservoir in which all kinds of field forces and forms dissolve
in infinitesimal time. In Genesis, it is understood as a coarse but homogeneous structure with
feasibility [4]. In Hesiod’s Theogony, chaos meant an empty space or matter not yet formed. It
was believed that order (i.e. cosmos) came out from chaos, which was also the beginning of time.
RATIONAL THINKING
The predominating elements of Middle East cosmology before rational thinking were:
(i) unlimited and infinity, (ii) the basic element of all things, and (iii) chaos and order. In this
respect, water was believed to represent all the properties described as such; and the first
natural philosopher, Thales of Miletus, considered water as the element of everything [5]. He
also thought that the earth rests on water as in the Sumerian cosmogony. Thales considered
water to be an element, and also as something that all other things can be reduced into [6]. He
used to visualize water together with a force that revives or moves it. In other words, the
mover and the moving are not separated and they coexist in the same object [7].
Water as the sole material principle, has been objected by Anaximander, the second
philosopher of Miletus. He introduced the concept of ‘apeiron, the unlimited or infinity’ and
proposed that it is both a principle (arche) and an element. Apeiron is a kind of reservoir
2
Ancient and Current Chaos Theories
where all varieties are not yet differentiated; they are entangled in the form of a composite
state. Apeiron is like a tank of all qualities, and it serves to conserve all beings.
He rejected the idea of a single element (like water) to be the founding principle of all
existing. He claimed that the single element wouldn’t allow the appearance of others.
According to him, any ‘elemental stuff’ can change into one or more of the other elemental
stuffs, and every ‘coming into being’ is due to the change of a pre-existent. He, in fact, is the
founder of a dynamic universe model by claiming the continuous generation of new things.
Anaximander thought that the contradictions like earth (dry), water (wet), fire (hot), and air
(cold) pre-existed before apeiron, and they were at fight (i.e. competition) with each other. He
thus pointed the importance of four-stuff long before Empedocles.
Anaximander also thought that the need for earth’s stability like water bears in some
problems, and one needs something stronger than an analogy and deeper than a cushion of
water [5]. He in fact thought the earth to be at rest at mid-space. He also claimed a kind of
primitive biological evolution theory.
The third philosopher of Miletus, Anaximenes, did not respect much the uncertainty in the
apeiron concept, and he returned to more concrete basic e (...truncated)