Review of The Etruscans. A Very Short Introduction.
Rasenna: Journal of the Center for Etruscan Studies
Volume 4 | Issue 1
Article 3
2014
Review of The Etruscans. A Very Short
Introduction.
Larissa Bonfante
New York University,
Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/rasenna
Recommended Citation
Bonfante, Larissa (2015) "Review of The Etruscans. A Very Short Introduction.," Rasenna: Journal of the Center for Etruscan Studies:
Vol. 4: Iss. 1, Article 3.
Available at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/rasenna/vol4/iss1/3
This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the CES Electronic Resources at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted
for inclusion in Rasenna: Journal of the Center for Etruscan Studies by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information,
please contact .
The
Etruscans.
A
Very
Short
Introduction,
by
CHRISTOPHER
SMITH.
Oxford:
Oxford
University
Press,
2014.
ISBN:
978-‐0-‐19-‐954791-‐3;
148
pages;
17
illustrations.
Reviewed
by
LARISSA
BONFANTE,
New
York
University
The
very
successful
series
of
Very
Short
Introductions
now
includes
a
booklet
on
the
Etruscans
written
by
a
Roman
historian
who,
as
Director
of
the
British
School
at
Rome
and
next-‐door
neighbor
of
the
Etruscan
Museum
at
Villa
Giulia,
is
in
a
favored
position
to
keep
up
with
the
latest
conferences,
controversies,
lectures,
and
discoveries.
The
series
format
calls
for
extreme
brevity,
a
bit
of
Further
Reading
and
an
Index.
In
this
volume
the
author
was
allowed
to
have
illustrations
–
there
are
17
of
them,
including
useful
maps
of
Italy
and
Etruria
and
of
some
of
the
cities,
all
of
them
in
sober
black
and
white,
but
important
in
that
they
remind
the
reader
that
most
of
the
evidence
for
the
Etruscan
past
is
archaeological
and
visual.
The
book
is
organized
into
twelve
brief
chapters,
the
first
dealing
with
the
question
of
the
origin
of
the
Etruscans,
and
the
second
on
the
closely
related
subject
of
the
language.
The
origin
of
the
Etruscans
has
gained
new
strength
since
a
study
of
the
DNA
of
Turkish
populations
was
said
to
bring
a
new
kind
of
evidence
to
bear
on
the
subject.
The
recent
book
edited
by
Vincenzo
Bellelli
(2014)
includes
a
great
deal
of
modern
discussion.
The
origin
of
the
people
who
lived
in
central
Italy
between
the
Arno
and
the
Tiber
is
not
a
mystery
for
archaeologists,
who
can
trace
the
development
of
settlements
into
great
cities
for
over
a
thousand
years,
1200–100
BCE.
In
the
course
of
time,
there
was
also
much
interchange
of
ideas
and
technologies
with
their
closest
neighbors,
the
Latins
and
other
neighbors
in
Italy.
But
for
linguists
the
fact
that
their
non-‐Indo-‐
European
language
and
religion
were
quite
different
from
those
of
any
one
else’s
remains
a
problem.
The
area
may
have
been
left
as
an
island
when
the
Indo-‐
Europeans
came
down
from
the
north,
bringing
with
them
their
male
weather
gods,
their
language
and
a
certain
social
structure
(Latin
rēx
‘king’
and
Sanskrit
rājā
‘king’).
It
may
also
mean
that,
as
in
America,
there
were
different
peoples
that
came
together,
and
the
language
finally
adopted,
for
historical
reasons
no
longer
clear
to
us,
was
that
of
a
foreign
elite.
The
Basques,
too,
kept
their
own
language;
but
the
Etruscans
were
not
hidden
in
the
mountains
–
they
had,
and
kept,
vast
fertile
fields
and
some
of
the
best
harbors
in
the
Mediterranean.
In
antiquity,
as
Smith
reminds
us,
there
were
different
theories
about
the
origin
of
the
Etruscans.
According
to
Herodotus’
Lydian
theory
they
came
from
the
East,
in
huge
boatloads
like
the
later
Greek
colonization.
According
to
Dionysius
of
Halicarnassus,
who
was
anxious
to
show
that
the
Romans
were
not
barbaroi,
but
indeed
a
Greek
city,
the
Etruscans
Review
of
The
Etruscans.
A
Very
Short
Introduction
2
were
autochthonous.
As
Elias
Bickerman
noted
(1952:
65–81;
cf.
Gabba
1987:
10,
34,
135),
each
of
these
historians
had
his
own
agenda.
The
chapter
on
language
packs
a
great
deal
of
information
in
a
mere
five
pages,
which
include
a
table
of
alphabets
and
a
muddy
grey
photo
of
the
Pyrgi
tablets
(drawings,
which
would
be
more
useful,
could
perhaps
be
substituted
in
future
editions).
An
important
paragraph
briefly
discusses
recent
work
on
names
and
the
development
of
the
gentilicial
system.1
After
the
eighth
century
BCE
and
the
move
to
urbanized
foundations,
individuals
no
longer
had
only
one
name
(to
which
could
be
added
their
father’s
name
or
patronymic).
Men
–
and
women,
but
not
slaves
–
had
both
a
praenomen
and
a
family
name
to
distinguish
them
socially,
and
to
facilitate
recording
family
relationships
and
inheritance
of
property.
A
glance
at
the
most
interesting
of
the
28
Etruscan–Latin
bilingual
epitaphs,
in
which
Laris
Cafatius,
son
(...truncated)